|
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1902281321220.5679@key0.esi.com.au> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:28:35 +1100 (AEDT) From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: FE Exception triggered by comparison On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Rich Felker wrote: >> Done. But the subroutine call is still hanging around. What am I >> doing wrong. > > It's an old glibc, not an old gcc, causing this. Don't worry. With MUSL's definitions, it is all in-line. Not really interested in GLIBC. I was just reverting to vanilla stuff for my testing in case I was doing stupid things with MUSL, .... And Alexander was right, I was being stabbed in the back by GCC with its use of UCOM... rather than COM.... That just added to my confusion. I also move back and forth between Chapel and C/C++ which further scrambles the thought processes. All sorted. Thanks - Damian Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037 Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.