|
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1902281155520.27639@key0.esi.com.au> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:07:36 +1100 (AEDT) From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: FE Exception triggered by comparison On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Markus Wichmann wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 03:09:54AM +1100, Damian McGuckin wrote: >> .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-36)" > > You might want to consider upgrading: Done. But the subroutine call is still hanging around. What am I doing wrong. Yours is: > .globl main > .type main, @function > main: > .LFB17: > .cfi_startproc > pxor %xmm0, %xmm0 > subq $8, %rsp > .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16 > movabsq $9218868437227405312, %rdx > divsd %xmm0, %xmm0 > leaq .LC0(%rip), %rsi > leaq .LC3(%rip), %rdi > movq %xmm0, %rax > btrq $63, %rax > cmpq %rdx, %rax > leaq .LC1(%rip), %rax > cmovbe %rax, %rsi > xorl %eax, %eax > call printf@PLT > xorl %eax, %eax > addq $8, %rsp > .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8 > ret > .cfi_endproc > .LFE17: > .size main, .-main > .ident "GCC: (Debian 8.2.0-14) 8.2.0" > .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits > > That sufficiently efficient for you? It would be if I could achieve it. What options do I need? I use gcc -S -O3 -msse4.2 -mfma mynan.c See below: .file "mynan.c" .text .section .rodata.str1.1,"aMS",@progbits,1 .LC0: .string "yes" .LC1: .string "no!" .LC3: .string "what %s\n" .section .text.startup,"ax",@progbits .p2align 4,,15 .globl main .type main, @function main: .LFB14: .cfi_startproc vxorpd %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 subq $8, %rsp .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16 vdivsd %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 call __isnan movl $.LC0, %esi movl $.LC3, %edi testl %eax, %eax movl $.LC1, %eax cmove %rax, %rsi xorl %eax, %eax call printf xorl %eax, %eax addq $8, %rsp .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8 ret .cfi_endproc .LFE14: .size main, .-main .ident "GCC: (GNU) 8.2.1 20180905 (Red Hat 8.2.1-3)" .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits It is the standard package with devtools-8 under CentOS. Thanks - Damian Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037 Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.