[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181206203111.3fbb2067@orivej.orivej.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 20:31:11 +0000
From: Orivej Desh <orivej@....fr>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: sem_wait and EINTR
* Markus Wichmann <nullplan@....net> [2018-12-06]
> Hi all,
>
> is the attached patch acceptable? A word about the bitfields: I
> generally dislike them for most things, but I didn't want to destroy the
> alignment struct __libc had going on, and these other flags really only
> are 0 or 1.
>
> Patch is untested for want of an old kernel.
Thank you! I have checked that your patch works as intended.
I have emulated an old kernel with this:
--- a/src/thread/__timedwait.c
+++ b/src/thread/__timedwait.c
@@ -28 +28 @@ int __timedwait_cp(volatile int *addr, int val,
- r = -__syscall_cp(SYS_futex, addr, FUTEX_WAIT|priv, val, top);
+ r = EINTR;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
