[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPyFy2CHOSetvJKBL0Re++rSTVJYRnTB27Zsph8_xharyTHGww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:27:00 -0400
From: Ed Maste <emaste@...ebsd.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: qsort_r or qsort_s in musl
> qsort_r was at first rejected because of the conflicting definitions
> -- existence of same-named interfaces with different semantics or
> signatures is one of the big criteria for exclusion of nonstandard
> extensions in musl. However, from the FreeBSD side at least there
> seems to be interest in dropping their version and agreeing upon a
> standard aligned with glibc's version, for the sake of POSIX:
If you want to see the current state of this in FreeBSD, we have a
code review in progress in Phabricator at
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083. If POSIX standardizes on the glibc
version I'm sure we'll follow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
