|
Message-ID: <479b50bd-7079-c31a-411c-f22603404362@dd-wrt.com> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 20:19:10 +0200 From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@...wrt.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SO_PEERSEC is wrong on MIPS / MIPS64 Systems forget this email. i have seen its already fixed Am 19.08.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Sebastian Gottschall: > musl defined SO_PEERSEC as 31, but on MIPS and MIPS64 systems it must > be 30 > and of course this isnt the only wrong one. see SO_SNDBUFFORCE 32 vs > 31. havent checked them all > > Sebastian > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.