[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1011541533649083@iva4-406defa25fee.qloud-c.yandex.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 16:38:03 +0300
From: Dmitry Golovin <dima@...ovin.in>
To: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: clang/musl/linux?
07.08.2018, 16:19, "Jon Chesterfield" <jonathanchesterfield@...il.com>:
> I'm interested in using a toolchain containing clang, musl and the llvm C++ stack from a glibc linux host. There is some patchy documentation on doing this which suggests it is possible with some relatively minor patches. Most of the links are from a few years ago.
>
> Does anyone on this list use a similar setup today? If so, does it work for you?
>
> Essentially I'm hoping for guidance on whether the end result of the cmake hackery would be stable enough to use as my daily toolchain, before grinding through the inevitable plumbing.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jon
Unfortunately, it's not possible to build mainline linux with clang right now. Currently most efforts on patching the kernel are combined in this repo: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux (it is also not ready to be compiled yet).
You can also check my GNU-free toolchain as a starting point: https://github.com/tpimh/ngtc
It uses musl, clang, lld and libcxx with very little patching.
Regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
