[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180718213721.GP4418@port70.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:37:22 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Segmentation fault in static binaries built with
recent binutils
* Reiner Herrmann <reiner@...ner-h.de> [2018-07-18 22:53:20 +0200]:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:19:28PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > the difference between the two cases was --build-id
> >
> > --build-id=sha1 works, --build-id=none segfaults
> >
> > i assume the note section with the build id happens
> > to force ld to keep the initial load segment, but
> > that should be there without any note section, so
> > it's likely a binutils bug (i see it on 2.30 and
> > master branch too)
>
> Do you mean you see the bug on 2.30, or the initial load segment?
> Because with 2.30 it's working for me (the initial load segment is there).
>
> Thanks for your investigation and the suggested workaround!
>
i opened
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428
i see the same behaviour on debian sid with
$ ld --version
GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.30.90.20180710
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version.
This program has absolutely no warranty.
i haven't bisected the issue but i suspect both
2.30 and 2.31 branches are affected by some recent
change (but not the initial 2.30 release).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
