|
Message-ID: <20180626202804.GW1392@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:28:04 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys/socket.h: fix SO_PEERSEC value on MIPS On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:20:53PM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > On 06/26/2018 10:05 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:21:38PM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > >> On 06/25/2018 07:52 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > >>> On 06/24/2018 05:30 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > >>>>> Differing from all other archs supported by musl, MIPS defines SO_PEERSEC > >>>>> to 30 instead of 31. > >>>>> > >>>>> Reported-by: Andrey Jr. Mlenikov <temnota.am@...il.com> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> arch/mips/bits/socket.h | 2 ++ > >>>>> arch/mips64/bits/socket.h | 2 ++ > >>>>> arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h | 2 ++ > >>>>> include/sys/socket.h | 3 +++ > >>>>> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/bits/socket.h b/arch/mips/bits/socket.h > >>>>> index 191ebdb5a418..39c42b822ac3 100644 > >>>>> --- a/arch/mips/bits/socket.h > >>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/bits/socket.h > >>>>> @@ -48,5 +48,7 @@ struct cmsghdr { > >>>>> #define SO_SNDBUFFORCE 31 > >>>>> #define SO_RCVBUFFORCE 33 > >>>>> > >>>>> +#define SO_PEERSEC 30 > >>>>> + > >>>>> #define SOCK_NONBLOCK 0200 > >>>>> #define SOCK_CLOEXEC 02000000 > >>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips64/bits/socket.h b/arch/mips64/bits/socket.h > >>>>> index cf801797beb0..39b764df4c62 100644 > >>>>> --- a/arch/mips64/bits/socket.h > >>>>> +++ b/arch/mips64/bits/socket.h > >>>>> @@ -64,5 +64,7 @@ struct cmsghdr { > >>>>> #define SO_SNDBUFFORCE 31 > >>>>> #define SO_RCVBUFFORCE 33 > >>>>> > >>>>> +#define SO_PEERSEC 30 > >>>>> + > >>>>> #define SOCK_NONBLOCK 0200 > >>>>> #define SOCK_CLOEXEC 02000000 > >>>>> diff --git a/arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h b/arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h > >>>>> index 191ebdb5a418..39c42b822ac3 100644 > >>>>> --- a/arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h > >>>>> +++ b/arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h > >>>>> @@ -48,5 +48,7 @@ struct cmsghdr { > >>>>> #define SO_SNDBUFFORCE 31 > >>>>> #define SO_RCVBUFFORCE 33 > >>>>> > >>>>> +#define SO_PEERSEC 30 > >>>>> + > >>>>> #define SOCK_NONBLOCK 0200 > >>>>> #define SOCK_CLOEXEC 02000000 > >>>>> diff --git a/include/sys/socket.h b/include/sys/socket.h > >>>>> index 507da5cc2a40..6b6cf2fc3988 100644 > >>>>> --- a/include/sys/socket.h > >>>>> +++ b/include/sys/socket.h > >>>>> @@ -203,7 +203,10 @@ struct linger { > >>>>> #define SO_TIMESTAMP 29 > >>>>> #define SCM_TIMESTAMP SO_TIMESTAMP > >>>>> > >>>>> +#ifndef SO_PEERSEC > >>>>> #define SO_PEERSEC 31 > >>>>> +#endif > >>>>> + > >>>>> #define SO_PASSSEC 34 > >>>>> #define SO_TIMESTAMPNS 35 > >>>>> #define SCM_TIMESTAMPNS SO_TIMESTAMPNS > >>>>> -- > >>>>> 2.18.0 > >>>> > >>>> Should we perhaps do this under the SO_DEBUG conditional like all the > >>>> other SO_* that vary by arch? Doing so would require adding > >>>> definitions to the other weird archs (ibm ones) but might be cleaner > >>>> in the top-level header -- I'm not sure. > >>>> > >>>> Rich > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> That would actually make sense. I did not research what SO_PEERSEC even is > >>> before I sent the patch; only know I noticed that both the constants > >>> defined under SO_DEBUG and the others below the #endif are SOL_SOCKET, so > >>> it would be more consistent to move it under SO_DEBUG as well. > >> > >> Should I send an updated patch, or are you going to fix it up yourself? > > > > I'm doing it now. Thanks. I think we're going to find that there are > > more SO_* that might vary by arch, especially if we ever add sparc. > > > > What I'd kind of like to eventually do is get rid of the definitions > > in sys/socket.h itself and always have them all in bits, with most > > archs sharing the arch/generic version of the bits header. However > > that doesn't work with the current bits/socket.h since the generic > > definitions of msghdr and cmsghdr don't work on 64-bit. Perhaps we > > should introduce a new bits/sockopt.h (but this imposes an extra file > > open/parse for every #include <sys/socket.h>) or find some way to > > avoid the gratuitous difference (maybe alltypes.h could somehow > > provide padding definitions for a generic definition of [c]msghdr to > > use). > > > > Anyway I won't delay the immediate bugfix with what-ifs about future > > direction. > > > > Rich > > > > Thanks. It seems you missed to add SO_PEERSEC to powerpc{,64} and s390x > though, which also define SO_DEBUG. Oops, will fix right away. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.