|
Message-ID: <1e699a6f-22b8-83fc-9ef4-04b2ad8542f2@universe-factory.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 20:21:38 +0200
From: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@...verse-factory.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys/socket.h: fix SO_PEERSEC value on MIPS
On 06/25/2018 07:52 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 06/24/2018 05:30 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>>> Differing from all other archs supported by musl, MIPS defines SO_PEERSEC
>>> to 30 instead of 31.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Andrey Jr. Mlenikov <temnota.am@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/mips/bits/socket.h | 2 ++
>>> arch/mips64/bits/socket.h | 2 ++
>>> arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h | 2 ++
>>> include/sys/socket.h | 3 +++
>>> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/bits/socket.h b/arch/mips/bits/socket.h
>>> index 191ebdb5a418..39c42b822ac3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips/bits/socket.h
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/bits/socket.h
>>> @@ -48,5 +48,7 @@ struct cmsghdr {
>>> #define SO_SNDBUFFORCE 31
>>> #define SO_RCVBUFFORCE 33
>>>
>>> +#define SO_PEERSEC 30
>>> +
>>> #define SOCK_NONBLOCK 0200
>>> #define SOCK_CLOEXEC 02000000
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips64/bits/socket.h b/arch/mips64/bits/socket.h
>>> index cf801797beb0..39b764df4c62 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips64/bits/socket.h
>>> +++ b/arch/mips64/bits/socket.h
>>> @@ -64,5 +64,7 @@ struct cmsghdr {
>>> #define SO_SNDBUFFORCE 31
>>> #define SO_RCVBUFFORCE 33
>>>
>>> +#define SO_PEERSEC 30
>>> +
>>> #define SOCK_NONBLOCK 0200
>>> #define SOCK_CLOEXEC 02000000
>>> diff --git a/arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h b/arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h
>>> index 191ebdb5a418..39c42b822ac3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h
>>> +++ b/arch/mipsn32/bits/socket.h
>>> @@ -48,5 +48,7 @@ struct cmsghdr {
>>> #define SO_SNDBUFFORCE 31
>>> #define SO_RCVBUFFORCE 33
>>>
>>> +#define SO_PEERSEC 30
>>> +
>>> #define SOCK_NONBLOCK 0200
>>> #define SOCK_CLOEXEC 02000000
>>> diff --git a/include/sys/socket.h b/include/sys/socket.h
>>> index 507da5cc2a40..6b6cf2fc3988 100644
>>> --- a/include/sys/socket.h
>>> +++ b/include/sys/socket.h
>>> @@ -203,7 +203,10 @@ struct linger {
>>> #define SO_TIMESTAMP 29
>>> #define SCM_TIMESTAMP SO_TIMESTAMP
>>>
>>> +#ifndef SO_PEERSEC
>>> #define SO_PEERSEC 31
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> #define SO_PASSSEC 34
>>> #define SO_TIMESTAMPNS 35
>>> #define SCM_TIMESTAMPNS SO_TIMESTAMPNS
>>> --
>>> 2.18.0
>>
>> Should we perhaps do this under the SO_DEBUG conditional like all the
>> other SO_* that vary by arch? Doing so would require adding
>> definitions to the other weird archs (ibm ones) but might be cleaner
>> in the top-level header -- I'm not sure.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>
>
> That would actually make sense. I did not research what SO_PEERSEC even is
> before I sent the patch; only know I noticed that both the constants
> defined under SO_DEBUG and the others below the #endif are SOL_SOCKET, so
> it would be more consistent to move it under SO_DEBUG as well.
>
> Matthias
>
Should I send an updated patch, or are you going to fix it up yourself?
Matthias
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.