[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180614142045.GL1392@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:20:45 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: broken __kernel_mode_t affecting some big endian archs
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:19:31PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:54:42 -0400
> Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>
> > It's been semi-known for a long time (I say semi-, because nobody's
> > had the setup to test most of them well, or at least nobody I'm
> > communicating with regularly) that some archs are failing libc-test
> > sysvipc tests. I think I've tracked down the root cause.
> >
> > Linux defined __kernel_mode_t as short on some old archs, and used it
> > in place of mode_t in the ipc_perm structure. The field is padded out
> > to 32 bits, so on little endian archs it's no problem for us to just
> > (as we do) ignore the incorrect type and declare the structure with
> > mode_t, as POSIX requires. However on big-endian archs, the padding is
> > on the wrong side and this trick doesn't work.
> >
> > On MIPS we fixed a similar issue in struct stat, where dev_t was
> > incorrectly padded, with a fixup in syscall_arch.h. However this time
> > a large number of archs are affected, and patching them all up
> > individually seems nasty.
> >
> > My leaning is to have syscall_arch.h expose a macro indicating the
> > bug, and have msgctl, semctl, and shmctl each do the fixup if it's
> > set.
> >
> > FWIW the affected archs seem to be (only in big endian variants):
> > - ARM
> > - M68k (in-progress port)
> > - Microblaze
> > - SH
> > - Sparc (future port)
>
> Is s390s affected too?
Presumably you mean s390x, and it's not affected -- the bad (short)
definition of __kernel_mode_t is contingent on 32-bit s390 in the s390
version of asm/posix_types.h. This seems to be a pattern across
several archs with 32/64 bit variants, and there doesn't seem to be
any explanation for why it should be except possibly that, when adding
the 64-bit variant, somebody noticed the awful legacy __kernel_mode_t
definition and thought to fix it...
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
