[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180315144015.GD1436@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:40:15 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: How to test if dlclose is a no-op?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:32:34AM -0500, Thadeus Fleming wrote:
> In the spirit of not “assum[ing] a certain implementation has
> particular properties rather than testing,” how can one test if
> dlclose is a no-op, as it is in musl, without breaking things if it
> isn’t?
This sounds like an XY problem¹. Do you care about whether you can
recover virtual memory space, whether the underlying fs objects remain
referenced, whether there's a cycle of dtors and ctors running, or
something else?
FYI there is no clear answer to the question even on other
implementations. glibc only sometimes unloads; there are corner cases
and race-type conditions where unloading is impossible for them. You
really should not be designing around an assumption/requirement that
anything get unloaded.
Rich
¹ http://xyproblem.info/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
