|
Message-ID: <20180315111705.GV4418@port70.net> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:17:05 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: Bracken Dawson <abdawson@...il.com>, musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Program with constructor function segfaults frequently with musl * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2018-03-15 12:01:44 +0100]: > * Bracken Dawson <abdawson@...il.com> [2018-03-15 10:38:31 +0000]: > > I have been having trouble getting a cgo program to run with musl, it has > > been segfaulting frequently and with 'No stack' when run under gdb. > > > > I have managed to reproduce such a failure in pure c with a very small > > example: > > > > ``` > > #include <stdio.h> > > #include <stdlib.h> > > #include <getopt.h> > > > > __attribute__((constructor)) void enter_namespace(int argc, char *argv[]) { > > the arguments passed to ctors are not part of the elf abi > http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch5.dynamic.html#init_fini ah this does not explain the type signature, the right link is http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.sheader.html#init_array > (and it cannot really work for dynamically loaded libraries anyway: > the application can arbitrarily clobber argv by that time) > > glibc passes these arguments as an extension (the semantics > for dlopened libraries is unclear), which happens to work > since the calling convention of functions with no arguments > allows this on all supported targets. > > (note that there are security hardenning solutions that check > the call site function signature against the callee and abort on > mismatch and such extension would not work with that) > > is this cgo that tries to capture argv in a ctor or some other > c library? (in either case you should first try to solve it > portably without depending on the glibc extension)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.