[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0502MB3885CA1C811AF5DD46DBFFF7E70F0@VI1PR0502MB3885.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:03:52 +0000
From: Nicholas Wilson <nicholas.wilson@...lvnc.com>
To: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] split __libc_start_main.c into two files (Wasm)
On 19 December 2017 17:54, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> It sounds to me that for practical use you'd want a Wasm module to correspond
> roughly to a shared library (with possibly multiple externally callable
> functions) that doesn't carry a 'main' function at all. Is that correct?
Yes, that's right. Maybe think of it though as a statically-linked shared library. We don't have dynamic linking yet, and when we do it's going to look very different to ELF (possibly/probably?). I want to get simple statically-linked modules working first, before adding a dynamic linker to the mix! In fact I know some people from Mozilla are working on dynamic linking, but I haven't looked into what they've done in detail.
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
