[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171128175221.GP15263@port70.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:52:22 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Wasm support patch 2 (static syscalls)
* John Starks <John.Starks@...rosoft.com> [2017-11-28 16:51:19 +0000]:
> What if you redefine the syscall numbers in wasm to be function pointers to the actual syscalls, e.g. #define SYS_unlink ((long)&__syscall_unlink). Then __syscall and friends can just apply the arguments to the function pointer. This should play nice with the linker and probably optimizes well.
you have to be able to cast it to the right type of
function pointer then and pass the right amount of
arguments.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
