[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15f751aa880.1189c6663375165.5783643331307535869@pocketcluster.io>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:03:22 -0700
From: Sung-Taek Kim <stkim1@...ketcluster.io>
To: "musl" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: libc-test on aarch64
---- On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 04:50:32 -0700 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote ----
> the current standard allows rounding functions to either
> consistently raise inexact or not raise exceptions for
> non-integer inputs. the c code in musl was written so
> it raises inexact (following fdlibm convention), and the
> tests try to check for that.
>
> but the other way is correct too and ieee754-2008 made
> that a requirement and future c fp standard (ts 18661)
> will require that too, so eventually both the c code in
> musl and the test system should be fixed to check for that.
>
In that case, may I start looking into updating the test cases?
Could you be kind enough to point out an entry point case with which I can work out from there on?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
