[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.20.13.1708302232430.21360@monopod.intra.ispras.ru>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 22:37:44 +0300 (MSK)
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: open issues
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Rich Felker wrote:
> Great find. I wonder if compiler/diagnostic tool ppl are aware of this
> extension to the C language that XSI imposes. It definitely affects
> things like UBSan, and of course compilers' optimization based on
> assumptions that UB doesn't happen.
If musl is going to use this throughout the implementation, I think it
should be documented somewhere: it's of course fair game to use this
guarantee in implementation of interfaces that are themselves XSI-shaded,
but using it to implement more basic interfaces is less obviously so.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
