[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170817042916.GR28021@waldemar-brodkorb.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 06:29:16 +0200
From: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@...nadk.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: bbox: musl versus uclibc
Hi,
Jorge Almeida wrote,
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
> <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:59:41 -0500, wdlkmpx wrote:
> >
>
> >> The project has been badly managed.. thats the only reason i can think
> >
> > uClibc-ng is alive at https://uclibc-ng.org/. Regular releases
> > (actually more regular than musl in recent months!), updated web site,
> > responsive maintainer, lots of cleanup in the code base, and QA effort.
> >
>
> I just visited the link you provided. I was curious to know whether to
> compile a program one still has to "make menuconfig", which IMO is
> fine for the linux kernel. So I clicked the "Documentation" link. It
> leads to an "Overview over different language related features".
>
> What did I do wrong?
Nothing. I updated the page now.
A valid config is still required to build a uClibc-ng toolchain.
You can avoid this by just using Buildroot, Crosstool-ng or OpenADK,
which all have good uClibc-ng toolchain support.
best regards
Waldemar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
