[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170728130101.GY1627@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:01:01 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: stdbool.h does not define _Bool when included by C++ code
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:21:10PM +1200, Michael Clark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed an issue with the musl headers when installing
> compiler-explorer for RISC-V. Try compiling this code with g++ and
> musl's stdbool.h
>
> - https://cx.rv8.io/g/Bc3AwY <https://cx.rv8.io/>
>
> Compiler explorer uses the C++ front-end to the compiler by default
>
> It seems the musl stdbool.h defines bool in terms of _Bool for C,
> but does not define _Bool in terms of bool for C++.
>
> The gcc stdbool.h header handles both conditions and when included
> by C++ code it has #define _Bool bool but notes that it is a GNU
> extension.
I see; this is probably why I wasn't aware of it. I don't think it
would be objectionable to add.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
