[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170711104321.GA546@freedom>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:43:21 +0000
From: sylvain.bertrand@...il.com
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: symlinks of glibc shared libs to musl libc.so
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:06:44AM +0000, sylvain.bertrand@...il.com wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 10:02:21PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:36:40AM +0000, sylvain.bertrand@...il.com wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have some binaries which are dependent on glibc shared libs (except libgcc_s) and the glibc dynamic loader.
> > > For instance: libdl, libpthreads...
> > >
> > > Do symlinks on libc.so based on glibc sonames give me a chance to make them work? (in
> > > theory yes, since the symbols are there).
> >
> > Are you asking about trying to run glibc-linked binaries with musl
> > libc.so?
>
> Exactly!
>
> From you experience and feedbacks, do you think I have a chance with the proper
> glibc symlinks?
No answer, does it mean there are too many glibc specific symbols?
--
Sylvain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
