|
Message-ID: <20170613155513.GB27071@port70.net> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:55:13 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390x: Add single instruction math functions * David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@...il.com> [2017-06-12 17:02:27 -0400]: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote: > > * David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@...il.com> [2017-06-12 09:54:54 -0400]: > >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:28 AM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@...il.com> wrote: > >> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote: > >> >> * David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@...il.com> [2017-06-11 22:46:09 -0400]: > >> >>> The following IBM table of supported and tested systems > >> >>> > >> >>> https://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/linux/resources/testedplatforms.html > >> >>> > >> >>> shows that RHEL 7 and SLES 12 require at least z196, and Ubuntu 16.04 > >> >>> requires at least zEC12. > >> >>> > >> >>> I can't find any official hardware requirements description for Alpine > >> >>> Linux. I tend to doubt that user would run it on older hardware, > >> >>> especially hardware no longer supported by other, modern Linux > >> >>> distributions. > >> >>> > >> >>> Building musl libc on older hardware is a nice accomplishment, but > >> >>> investing effort and complexity to maintain support probably isn't > >> >>> useful to any musl libc user and probably isn't a productive use of > >> >>> developer resources. > >> >>> > >> >>> I will continue to inquire if there is a simple technique to accomplish this. > >> > > >> > Apparently GCC 7.1 added architecture macros. > >> > > >> > As Tuan referenced, Alpine Linux also requires z196 as the minimum > >> > architecture level. I believe that it would be better for s390-musl > >> > to default to z196 ISA than musl to require GCC 7.1. > >> > >> Would a patch such as the following be acceptable? > >> > >> Thanks, David > >> > >> diff --git a/configure b/configure > >> index c2db298..a9e0256 100755 > >> --- a/configure > >> +++ b/configure > >> @@ -494,6 +494,15 @@ fnmatch '-mtune=*|*\ -mtune=*' "$CC $CFLAGS" || tryldflag C > >> fi > >> > >> # > >> +# On s390x, default to z196 architecture and zEC12 tuning to support newer math > >> +# instructions. > >> +# > >> +if test "$ARCH" = "s390x" ; then > >> +fnmatch '-march=*|*\ -march=*' "$CC $CFLAGS" || tryldflag CFLAGS_AUTO > >> -march=z196 > >> +fnmatch '-mtune=*|*\ -mtune=*' "$CC $CFLAGS" || tryldflag CFLAGS_AUTO > >> -mtune=zEC12 > >> +fi > >> + > >> +# > >> # Even with -std=c99, gcc accepts some constructs which are constraint > >> # violations. We want to treat these as errors regardless of whether > >> # other purely stylistic warnings are enabled -- especially implicit > > > > well the toolchain may be configured for a different/newer cpu > > and then we may not want to override that.. what about > > > > diff --git a/configure b/configure > > index c2db298c..bcaf3a7d 100755 > > --- a/configure > > +++ b/configure > > @@ -656,6 +656,12 @@ trycppif __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ "$t" && SUBARCH=${SUBARCH}le > > trycppif _SOFT_FLOAT "$t" && fail "$0: error: soft-float not supported on powerpc64" > > fi > > > > +if test "$ARCH" = "s390x" ; then > > +echo 'float x; void f(){__asm__("fiebra %0,6,%1,4":"=f"(x):"f"(x));}' > "$tmpc" > > +$CC $CFLAGS_C99FSE $CPPFLAGS $CFLAGS -c -o /dev/null "$tmpc" >/dev/null 2>&1 || > > + fail "$0: error: s390x isa level is too low, use at least -march=z196" > > +fi > > + > > if test "$ARCH" = "sh" ; then > > tryflag CFLAGS_AUTO -Wa,--isa=any > > trycppif __BIG_ENDIAN__ "$t" && SUBARCH=${SUBARCH}eb > > Why is the x86 configure logic that I used as a template correct? > hm i didnt know about that then the patch is probably ok. > Thanks, David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.