[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2db8b8b5-8145-19e2-238b-cf5e40108cba@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:52:08 +0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>, Yousong Zhou <yszhou4tech@...il.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@...rceware.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call
On 03/24/2017 03:35 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> If you file a report and it's deemed a bug in the standard and
> changed, I'm happy to change this on the musl side. Just keep me
> posted on what happens.
Keep me posted as well.
> I don't have any preference on what the
> behavior "should" be here (IMO imposing a behavior when the caller has
> violated constraints like passed a wrong value for how is pointless
> anyway) but I do want to conform to the standard.
IMO, no constrains were violated.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
