[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97280ba1-9a3c-0f19-90db-5b313980621a@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:44:04 -0600
From: Laine Gholson <laine.gholson@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SUSv2 c89 compilation environment symbols missing
yes I know SUSv2 is obsolete, but then why does musl even bother to define _SC_XBS5_ILP32_OFF32 then?
On 12/30/16 16:42, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 04:30:13PM -0600, Laine Gholson wrote:
>> musl defines, e.g _SC_XBS5_ILP32_OFF32, but not _CS_XBS5_ILP32_OFF32_CFLAGS
>> see http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xcu/getconf.html
>
> That's an ancient standard; the current one is here:
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/getconf.html
>
> It does not mention the macros you asked about. But it's also
> describing the getconf utility, not the unistd.h header. The latter is
> here:
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/unistd.h.html
>
> and I don't see anything about the above macros. For what it's worth,
> even the old version corresponding to the page you linked doesn't seem
> to specify them:
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/unistd.h.html
>
> Rich
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
