[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161215113041.GJ16379@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:30:42 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Handling of L and ll prefixes different from glibc
* A. Wilcox <awilfox@...lielinux.org> [2016-12-14 22:01:59 -0600]:
> On 14/12/16 20:30, Rich Felker wrote:
> > BTW I wonder if gcc's -Wformat catches these errors.
>
> It is meant to. I know that clang whines loudly on mismatched format
> specifiers, and I seem to recall it even whines on format specifiers
> that don't exist, but it has been a while since I checked GCC's.
despite clang propaganda, gcc actually has more detailed model
of printf now and thus gives better warnings
https://godbolt.org/g/Z0nnEH
note that clang does not warn at all, while gcc caught two bugs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
