[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a79fbb54-1651-ea6b-f3fd-576249d7fdeb@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:34:19 -0800
From: Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: fts in musl
The community wiki has an entry for why musl doesn't have fts.h:
http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/FAQ#Q:_why_is_fts.h_not_included_.3F
And it's right, fts certainly had LFS issues. However, the referenced
glibc 15838 was closed as a duplicate of 11460, and that bug was fixed
about a year ago by adding a proper fts64.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11460
So it would be nice if musl would implement the same interface as fts64.
I discovered this issue from a user having trouble with elfutils on
openwrt/lede, which has patched out some fts-using functionality to get
elfutils building on musl. Of course it would be much nicer if they
didn't need that patch.
Thanks,
Josh Stone
PS I'm not subscribed, so please CC replies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
