|
Message-ID: <20160916215841.GP15995@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 17:58:41 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix printf regression with alt-form octal, default precision On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:14:56PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:37:57PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:07:40AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > > commit v1.1.5-10-gb91cdbe2bc8b626aa04dc6e3e84345accf34e4b1 that fixed > > > behavior of printf with alt-form octal, zero precision, zero value, > > > at the same time broke alt-form octal with default precision, > > > e. g. printf("%#09o", 1). > > > --- > > > src/stdio/vfprintf.c | 9 ++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/src/stdio/vfprintf.c b/src/stdio/vfprintf.c > > > index 2ecf769..ac2891c 100644 > > > --- a/src/stdio/vfprintf.c > > > +++ b/src/stdio/vfprintf.c > > > @@ -570,7 +570,14 @@ static int printf_core(FILE *f, const char *fmt, va_list *ap, union arg *nl_arg, > > > if (0) { > > > case 'o': > > > a = fmt_o(arg.i, z); > > > - if ((fl&ALT_FORM) && p<z-a+1) p=z-a+1; > > > + if (fl&ALT_FORM) { > > > + if (p >= 0 && p<z-a+1) { > > > + p=z-a+1; > > > + } else if (arg.i) { > > > + prefix+=5; > > > + pl=1; > > > + } > > > + } > > > } if (0) { > > > case 'd': case 'i': > > > pl=1; > > > > I think the attached simpler patch should work just as well. Adjusting > > 'p' to implement '#' was probably a bad idea since it makes the later > > code paths think an explicit precision was specified when it was not. > > "Add a prefix of '0' when p is too short to have a leading '0' > > already" seems like safer logic. > > > > I'm also attaching some test cases I ran. > > > > Rich > > > > diff --git a/src/stdio/vfprintf.c b/src/stdio/vfprintf.c > > index 2ecf769..e439a07 100644 > > --- a/src/stdio/vfprintf.c > > +++ b/src/stdio/vfprintf.c > > @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static int printf_core(FILE *f, const char *fmt, va_list *ap, union arg *nl_arg, > > if (0) { > > case 'o': > > a = fmt_o(arg.i, z); > > - if ((fl&ALT_FORM) && p<z-a+1) p=z-a+1; > > + if ((fl&ALT_FORM) && p<z-a+1) prefix+=5, pl=1; > > } if (0) { > > case 'd': case 'i': > > pl=1; > > Yes, this also works, thanks. OK, I'm committing this version. Thanks! Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.