[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8498eaa7-f263-efc8-a59c-d601e84af2db@landley.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:58:52 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: "j-core@...ore.org" <j-core@...ore.org>, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [J-core] Aligned copies and cacheline conflicts?
On 09/14/2016 07:34 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> I could put a fork of memcpy.c in sh/memcpy.c and work on it there and
> only merge it back to the shared one if others test it on other archs
> and find it beneficial (or at least not harmful).
Both musl and the kernel need it. And yes at the moment it seems
architecture-specific, but it's a _big_ performance difference...
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
