|
Message-ID: <20160813192501.GE15995@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 15:25:02 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] getdtablesize: Fix returning hard instead of soft rlimit On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 08:31:49PM +0200, Olivier Brunel wrote: > --- > src/legacy/getdtablesize.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/legacy/getdtablesize.c b/src/legacy/getdtablesize.c > index 682da6d..b30c193 100644 > --- a/src/legacy/getdtablesize.c > +++ b/src/legacy/getdtablesize.c > @@ -7,5 +7,5 @@ int getdtablesize(void) > { > struct rlimit rl; > getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl); > - return rl.rlim_max < INT_MAX ? rl.rlim_max : INT_MAX; > + return rl.rlim_cur < INT_MAX ? rl.rlim_cur : INT_MAX; Is there a motivation for this? Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.