Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160620112855.GW22574@port70.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:28:55 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Peter Smith <peter.smith@...aro.org>,
	Rafael Esp?ndola <rafael.espindola@...il.com>,
	llvm-commits <llvm-commits@...ts.llvm.org>,
	gentoo-musl@...ts.gentoo.org,
	cfe-commits cfe <cfe-commits@...ts.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-musl] Re: Add support for musl-libc on Linux

* Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com> [2016-06-20 18:59:20 +0800]:
> 2016-06-20 17:37 GMT+08:00 Peter Smith <peter.smith@...aro.org>:
> > - isTargetEHABICompatible()
> > I'm making the assumption that musl supports the ARM exceptions EHABI,
> > if so you'll want to add MUSL and MUSLHF here.
> 
> I'm not 100% sure about this. Could some insider from musl confirm this?

musl is ehabi agnostic.

ehabi and libc should be independent.

throwing exceptions across libc boundary is undefined
behaviour, all ehabi support is in the compiler runtime.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.