[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOYuCc1KcX_n2m75FH-fX+67qwOgx7XTjLKtLnayBQnTqtxkng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:09:59 +0800
From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com>
To: Peter Smith <peter.smith@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola@...il.com>,
llvm-commits <llvm-commits@...ts.llvm.org>, musl@...ts.openwall.com,
gentoo-musl@...ts.gentoo.org, cfe-commits cfe <cfe-commits@...ts.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-musl] Re: Add support for musl-libc on Linux
2016-06-20 19:44 GMT+08:00 Peter Smith <peter.smith@...aro.org>:
> From what I can see, the EABI type is used to decide if certain
> __aeabi_ prefixed functions such as __aeabi_idiv are available. If
> Musl differs in function availability from the GNU library here I
> think you'll need a Musl EABI type. However if there is no difference
> you should be able to use the EABI::GNU type for Musl.
I think musl and glibc is compatible on this; I'm just a little
concerned that using EABI::GNU for both GNUEABI* and MuslEABI* might
cause some confusion.
> You might find http://reviews.llvm.org/D12413 helpful here
> (introduction of -meabi option).
It seems clang's -meabi option is incompatible with gcc's.
Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
