[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab936d37-713f-ee98-9b12-716227314eac@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:58:20 -0700
From: "Zhao, Weiming" <weimingz@...eaurora.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: build musl for armv7m
Thank you, Szabolcs.
It's GAS-only flag, clang's integrated-as doesn't support it. I can use
-no-integrated-as.
It also expose other errors:
src/thread/arm/atomics.s:9: Error: cannot use register index with
PC-relative addressing -- `ldr ip,[pc,ip]'
Clang's integrated-as accepts it but seems encoded incorrectly.
I can fix it.
On 6/14/2016 9:32 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Zhao, Weiming <weimingz@...eaurora.org> [2016-06-14 09:12:17 -0700]:
>> I haven't did a full test as the functions I modified are not actually being
>> used.
>>
>> It is a bare-metal environment, using clang to compile.
>>
>> Main flags are -mcpu=cortex-m3 -Os -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections
>> -mno-unaligned-access
>>
>> Could you please let me know the gas option?
>>
> -mimplicit-it=always
>
> https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/ARM-Options.html
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Weiing
>>
>> On 6/14/2016 6:00 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:49:40AM -0700, weimingz@...eaurora.org wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm building MUSL with -mcpu=cortex-m3. There are a few .s files
>>>> that cannot be assembled because: (1) use predicated instructions
>>>> without IT instr (2) use sp inside reg list in ldmia/stmia.
>>>>
>>>> Please help to review the attached patch.
>>> Did you test anything? These patches do not result in working code;
>>> they just make it assemble without errors. There's already a gas
>>> option to automatically add IT instructions where needed for
>>> thumb-only targets, but that's not the only thing needed to support
>>> thumb-only/cortex-m. I'd be interested in knowing more about the setup
>>> you're trying to target. Is it Linux or bare-metal? If Linux, are you
>>> going to use the ARM/FDPIC toolchain & kernel mods? I'm about to leave
>>> at the moment but I'll follow up with a more detailed review of your
>>> patch later.
>>>
>>>> Also, is there any easy way of disabling string/arm/memcpy_le.S ?
>>>> For baremetal, unaligned access may be unavailable.
>>> That file does not perform any unaligned access. It should work on any
>>> EABI-supported version of the arm instruction set.
>>>
>>> Rich
>> --
>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
