[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG3jReL4C4MPrxYzPSoYfgcfVbH-H3V9--Mf34yEPzyTP-fz9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:11:45 -0400
From: Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>,
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org>
Subject: Re: Dynamic linker name
Sorry, but my understanding is that r272662 is correct for x86, no?
We can definitely add support for more arches with musl if someone sends a
patch to the list.
Cheers,
Rafael
On Jun 14, 2016 11:04 AM, "Szabolcs Nagy" <nsz@...t70.net> wrote:
> * Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> [2016-06-14 07:43:34 -0700]:
> > On Jun 5, 2016 6:47 PM, "Lei Zhang" <zhanglei.april@...il.com> wrote:
> > > One of the changes involved is to tell clang where to find musl's
> > > dynamic linker. My question is: is musl's dynamic linker always named
> > > "ld-musl-$ARCH.so.1" and put under /lib?
> >
> > There is a llvm clang patch for this already. Look at
> >
> >
> https://github.com/kraj/meta-clang/tree/master/recipes-devtools/clang/clang
>
> i think these should be upstreamed into clang and
> the recent r272662 clang commit should be reverted
> and the existing mips musl hacks should be fixed too.
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
