Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5729DC9A.7090807@skarnet.org>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 13:27:22 +0200
From: Laurent Bercot <ska-dietlibc@...rnet.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: [J-core] musl-cross-make / litecross improvements

On 04/05/2016 13:10, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> Still no native toolchains. :)
>>
>
> for native you need a musl based host
> at which point you can use a musl based
> distro that provides native toolchains.

  Huh? And what if you *are* the musl-based distro and need to build said
native toolchain?
  I'm surprised to hear you, of all people, mentioning "relying on your distro"
as a solution. :P

  I've had success, with the previous iteration of musl-cross-make,
building native toolchains via disabling --host in COMMON_CONFIG
(and compiling gmp, mpfr and mpc for the target first). In other words,
host=target (even if build!=host). They're still considered cross-toolchains,
as in the binaries are prefixed with ${ARCH}- , but they work. I'm not sure
whether it's still possible with the current version of mcm.

-- 
  Laurent

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.