[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKFiscf4vzsGNXAQ6Yy04nYWuzfU-KFrT1TsLAi0EuOkyX1ceA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:55:06 -0700
From: Christopher Lane <lanechr@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl licensing
On Mar 17, 2016 8:41 PM, "Rich Felker" <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:30:38PM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 05:31:48PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> > >
> > > Post-Berne no copyright statement is needed at all. Marking license
> > > terms, authors and dates in individual files is strictly a convenience
> > > factor for those using or reading the code.
> > >
> >
> > Yes. However, musl has had more than one person express a desire for
> > per-file copyright notifications. None of these people have expressed
> > interest in needlessly including a year. With this information, we can
> > ask if
> >
> > /* Copyright the musl authors. Available under a ___-style license,
which
> > can be found at http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/COPYRIGHT */
> >
> > would meet their needs.
>
> Generally I don't think people like (and I don't like) URL references
> to licenses because there's no guarantee that they don't change or
> linkrot. Referencing the copy in the top-level source tree COPYRIGHT
> file avoids that but obviously doesn't meet the needs of someone
> including it in another tree.
>
> If Google's lawyers are happy without adding per-file notices (which I
> haven't seen them asking for in any of the clarifying follow-up
> emails; correct me if I'm wrong) then I think we should treat this as
> a separate issue aside from trying to resolve the current license
> concerns they have, and follow up on it later.
>
> Rich
I asked our lawyers about per-file headers. Yes, it's clearer if the files
have headers. It's especially easier to copy on a per-file basis for
projects that need to do that. But the feedback I got was that the text in
the COPYRIGHT file that says basically "anything without a header has the
MIT license above" is clear enough for us to use musl. Having per-file
headers is not, IIUC a blocker for us.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
