[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPyFy2AgLyQCLjv5QzmPpfB2a87SMyLCXp7voVory62uoLZaFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:01:17 +0000
From: Ed Maste <emaste@...ebsd.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl licensing
On 16 March 2016 at 20:34, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>
> What about authorship/copyright holders per-file?
I have an interest in this as it applies to downstream consumers who
wish to use a portion of the software -- for example, I'd like to use
musl's memmem and strstr in FreeBSD's libc.
I've proposed copying the text from the top-level COPYRIGHT into the
individual files themselves. (In code review at
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2601 if you're interested.) If there were
a reference to the standalone copyright/license file it would need to
be modified anyway. Thus, from my perspective it doesn't much matter
if the original has no statement, or a one-line reference to a
separate file.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
