[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160312120954.GA14769@nyan>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:09:54 +0100
From: Felix Janda <felix.janda@...teo.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add `intl` to EMPTY_LIB_NAMES.
Masanori Ogino wrote:
> 2016-03-11 16:13 GMT+09:00 Masanori Ogino <masanori.ogino@...il.com>:
> > From the last link:
> >> According to the post linked from the above, the check seems to be there
> >> to exclude incompatible implementations of gettext(), like Solaris 7 and
> >> NetBSD:
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2006-03/msg00011.html
> >>
> >> If musl's gettext implementation is compatible with GNU gettext, I guess
> >> we could adjust the check to accept it. However, I have no idea which
> >> symbols or macros can be used for the check. It would be helpful if
> >> musl people could chime in and give us a hint.
>
> Well, is `__USE_GNU_GETTEXT` suitable for that?
That depends on whether the incompatible implementations do not also
define this macro. The NetBSD libintl.h header does not seem to do so.
However I'm not sure about Solaris. According to the man page its
libintl.h does define GNU_GETTEXT_SUPPORTED_REVISION but it's not clear
whether or not __USE_GNU_GETTEXT is also defined.
It can't hurt to ask on the gettext list.
Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
