[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DD7DBD.6010703@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:10:21 -0500
From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@...eBSD.org>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: FreeBSD's Google Summer of Code 2016
On 03/07/16 03:32, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-03-06 01:25, Rich Felker wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 07:14:34PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
... <snip>
>>> Of course I ahould have meant "based on regular FreeBSD kernel services".
>>>
>>>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.bsd/11702
>>>>>
>>>>> I am certain this will require more research but it would be useful
>>>>> for other ports as well.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We could ask Petr Salinger for the details, but I am pretty sure
>>> FreeBSD has the required functionality natively.
>>>
>>>> Glibc/NPTL has a lot of what I'd call "gratuitous abstraction" (like
>>>> the lll stuff) in their pthread primitives which makes this
>>>> "possible". I call it gratuitous because it's really really hard to
>>>> achieve correct implementations of the pthread sync primitives that
>>>> don't have serious corner-case bugs, and it's unlikely that their
>>>> abstractions actually suffice to make correct alternate
>>>> implementations.
>>>>
>>>> musl does not have any such abstraction. We require a compare-and-swap
>>>> operation or equivalent on which arbitrary atomic operations can be
>>>> constructed, a futex or equivalent operation that's roughly
>>>> while(*addr==expected) sleep(), and implement all the sync primitives
>>>> just once on top of these.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am not a threading expert (or even a CS guy), but it sounds like
>>> mutex(9) with condvar(9) would do [1]:
>>
>> No, they don't satisfy the needs of musl; they have their own
>> additional storage requirements and are probably not AS-safe. It might
>> be possible to use them to implement a userspace-emulated futex queue
>> (only if they are AS-safe), but I don't see a way to extend that to
>> the process-shared case.
> What about umtx? It's supposed to be just like linux futex.
>
Yes, that's it.
It is not well documented beyond the <sys/umtx.h> header but it
is indeed used to implement the linux abi futex and the native
libthr on FreeBSD.
Pedro.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
