|
Message-Id: <0DED8CA5-AABF-471F-AF89-26BFCB3F7B40@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:37:12 -0800
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: iproute2 & other software
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Stephen (iproute2) sent me a mail telling me that he rejected my patch to iproute2 for musl support:
>
> 1st reply:
> "
> I was waiting for others who had more to say on this.
> Ok with providing small fixes, but can't really guarantee iproute to
> work with other libraries.
> "
>
> & 2nd is :
> "
> Sorry, I have to reject this.
> All include files in include/linux come from headers automatically generated from upstream
> Linux source. This is the only way to ensure long term ABI/API consistency
> with kernel.
>
> Either fix musl or submit patches to upstream kernel and get them merged.
> “
Where is your patch.
>
> Can we look into providing somekind of compatibility layer for header files so that it's easier to get upstream projects like iproute2 to support musl ?
>
> Kind regards,
> //Logan
> C-x-C-c
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (205 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.