[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160225182233.GU9349@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:22:33 -0500
From: "dalias@...c.org" <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Jaydeep Patil <Jaydeep.Patil@...tec.com>,
Mahesh Bodapati <Mahesh.Bodapati@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: mips n64 porting review
Sorry for dropping the CC. More follow-up below:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 01:01:50PM -0500, dalias@...c.org wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:05:33PM +0000, Jaydeep Patil wrote:
> > >> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> > >> +struct kernel_stat {
> > >> + unsigned int st_dev;
> > >> + unsigned int __pad1[3];
> > >> + unsigned long long st_ino;
> > >> + unsigned int st_mode;
> > >> + unsigned int st_nlink;
> > >> + int st_uid;
> > >> + int st_gid;
> > >> + unsigned int st_rdev;
> > >> + unsigned int __pad2[3];
> > >> + long long st_size;
> > >> + unsigned int st_atime_sec;
> > >> + unsigned int st_atime_nsec;
> > >> + unsigned int st_mtime_sec;
> > >> + unsigned int st_mtime_nsec;
> > >> + unsigned int st_ctime_sec;
> > >> + unsigned int st_ctime_nsec;
> > >> + unsigned int st_blksize;
> > >> + unsigned int __pad3;
> > >> + unsigned long long st_blocks;
> > >> +};
> > >> +
> > >> +static void __stat_fix(struct kernel_stat *kst, struct stat *st)
> > >> +{
> > >> + extern void *memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
> > >> +
> > >> + st->st_dev = kst->st_dev;
> > >> + memset (&st->st_pad1, 0, sizeof (st->st_pad1));
> > >> + st->st_ino = kst->st_ino;
> > >> + st->st_mode = kst->st_mode;
> > >> + st->st_nlink = kst->st_nlink;
> > >> + st->st_uid = kst->st_uid;
> > >> + st->st_gid = kst->st_gid;
> > >> + st->st_rdev = kst->st_rdev;
> > >> + memset (&st->st_pad2, 0, sizeof (st->st_pad2));
> > >> + st->st_size = kst->st_size;
> > >> + st->st_pad3 = 0;
> > >> + st->st_atim.tv_sec = kst->st_atime_sec;
> > >> + st->st_atim.tv_nsec = kst->st_atime_nsec;
> > >> + st->st_mtim.tv_sec = kst->st_mtime_sec;
> > >> + st->st_mtim.tv_nsec = kst->st_mtime_nsec;
> > >> + st->st_ctim.tv_sec = kst->st_ctime_sec;
> > >> + st->st_ctim.tv_nsec = kst->st_ctime_nsec;
> > >> + st->st_blksize = kst->st_blksize;
> > >> + st->st_blocks = kst->st_blocks;
> > >> + memset (&st->st_pad5, 0, sizeof (st->st_pad5));
> > >> + return;
> > >> +}
> > >
> > >You've made this a lot more complicated than it needs to be. Just
> > >copying the __stat_fix code from 32-bit mips should work fine. The
> > >only fixup that needs to be done is for st_dev and st_rdev and it can
> > >be done in-place.
> >
> > In case of MIPS64, the stat syscall returns a structure as described
> > by 'struct kernel_stat'. The ' struct stat' in MIPS64 has following
> > notable difference as compared to 'struct kernel_stat':
> >
> > The st_nlink is of 8 bytes
>
> I missed that in my previous reading.
>
> For all existing archs, nlink_t was the native register size (_Reg) in
> the kernel stat struct. It looks like it's just 32-bit (unsigned int)
> on mips64 though. The clean way to handle this is just moving nlink_t
> back to the per-arch alltypes.h.in files to allow it to vary (or
> actually, just putting a definition in the mips one will override the
> generic one). So in arch/mips64/bits/alltypes.h.in:
>
> TYPEDEF unsigned nlink_t;
>
> > and all st_*tim members are of 16 bytes
>
> Uhg. Does mips64 actually use a 32-bit time_t? If so I think with
> current musl we're stuck as defining time_t as 32-bit, because it's
> used as an interface with all sorts of things in the kernel that we
> don't wrap/control. But this is going to need a lot more review to
> understand if there's any better solution. :(
>
> Even if time_t is 32-bit though, tv_nsec is always long, so the
> kernel's stat structure is broken and needs further fixups like you're
> doing. I don't see any way around this unless there's hope of the
> kernel 64-bit time_t stuff being merged soon, in which case we could
> use that from the beginning on mips64. It feels really awful to add a
> new 64-bit arch with 32-bit time_t.
>
> In light of this I'm not sure it makes sense to try to match the
> kernel's weird nlink_t (see above).
I've done further reading of what glibc and the kernel do, and it's
confusing. They seem to have 64-bit time_t and just botch it in struct
stat which glibc has to convert from the broken kernel structure to a
userspace-facing form. Looking at the other files in:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=tree;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits;h=c1f9a8df22be6d1c0eb62e20d1113a9f9a11f49a;hb=HEAD
they seem to use glibc's __time_t in kernel interfaces directly (e.g.
the sysvipc stuff) and from what I can tell the kernel expects a
64-bit __kernel_time_t in those places, so hopefully this isn't as bad
as I intitially thought.
> > (due to sizeof long in 64bit). Thus all members of ' struct stat'
> > starting from st_uid are at different offset than what stat syscall
> > has returned. In case of MIPS32, we just need to adjust dev_t (being
> > long long) as described in __stat_fix. However in case of MIPS64 we
> > need to members from 'struct kernel_stat' to 'struct stat'
>
> Yes...
As long as the time_t definition issue is not in question, I think
this is an okay path to move forward. It might be nice to make nlink_t
match whatever glibc used for it though so that our user-facing struct
and glibc's have matching layout/offsets.
Sorry for all the confusion over this.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
