|
Message-ID: <20160121224818.GE9621@port70.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:48:19 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: N Jain <jain61@...il.com> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: MUSL issue while loading C++ lib * N Jain <jain61@...il.com> [2016-01-21 16:17:36 -0500]: > > > > > i think the musl linker should be able to deal with this :P > > > > > Do you mean linking using "g++" is not right way ? I am trying to find out i meant the musl dynamic linker that loads the .so at runtime, not the static linker you used at compilation. > if I could use "ld" directly but not sure what options to use and how to > pass libs. when in doubt use -v too see what options gcc passes to ld > I am using below commands to compile and link > > gcc -c a.c -o bin/a.o > g++ -c acpp.cpp -o bin/acpp.o > > g++ bin/a.o bin/acpp.o -o a.elf > > While reading about the difference between ld and g++ linking I found g++ > uses ld itself. > Am I missing something ? > i dont think so and i think the linked binary is fine libstdc++.so.6 vs libgcc_s.so.1 has some issues which makes the musl linker fail to find some symbols. i can't help further, you will have to debug it, i'd try to look at dso->strings with gdb and why the find_sym fails or recompile musl with some dprintf added, or try a known working toolchain and compare against it, or wait for other ideas..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.