[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151117230606.GJ18372@port70.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:06:08 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Support for out-of-tree build
* Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2015-11-17 17:01:41 -0500]:
> However, at this point I'm strongly considering whether we should just
> do away with the subarch dirs entirely and use preprocessed asm or C
> with inline asm in their place. The one place this is mildly difficult
...
>
> Would this make things simpler for the build system? I think so.
ok, but that's a separate change then
i think the relevant decision for out-of-tree is
if we want to keep
%.o: $(ARCH)/%.s
which means VPATH is needed, or if it's ok to have
.o files under the $(ARCH) dir, so the rules are just
%.o: %.s
%.o: %.sub
(of course setting $(OBJS) is more tricky then)
i think we can then do out-of-tree independently from
the subarch changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
