[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO_RewZ5iPpV=6ohg7S7Sj2rRj-iGYQxXsRhvWa7whkwvs7efA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:02:27 -0700
From: Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search
I don't know the answer to that - my knowledge of the details of musl
are pretty limited and mostly stop at "search doesn't work".
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Jan Broer <jasiu.79@...il.com> wrote:
>>I think that is where we have arrived (except it's < and >= in your
>>expressions). Kubernetes will have to change some to satisfy the
>>assumed fungibility of nameservers, but it's the direction things are
>>almost certainly moving anyway.
>
> Hi Tim, i guess i skipped these last message - sorry.
>
> If you could clear this up for me:
> When there are multiple nameservers, does the musl resolver return the first
> response it receives regardless of it's status?
> So even when it is something like SERVFAIL or REFUSED it will not wait for
> the responses from the other nameservers that might be positive?
>
> Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
