|
Message-ID: <20151007064830.GL28311@example.net> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 08:48:30 +0200 From: u-uy74@...ey.se To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl bug or not, real or not? (Was: Update: pthread_getattr_np() vs explicit runtime) loader On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:36:54AM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > # cat /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space > > > 2 > > > > > > $ /pathtomusllibc.so --library-path /pathtogcc-5libs /pathto/jv-convert --help > > > Usage: jv-convert [OPTIONS] [INPUTFILE [OUTPUTFILE]] > > > > > > # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space > > > > > > $ /pathtomusllibc.so --library-path /pathtogcc-5libs /pathto/jv-convert --help > > > Segmentation fault > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Would anybody try this and confirm or refute? > It's just that nobody cares about gcj, I think. A good point, indeed. > Now that Alpine has moved to GCC 5.2, I've tried it with the distro packages. > I've installed gcc-java; > with both randomize_va_space = 0 and 2, specifying an alternate path to the > default musl dynamic linker in the same way you did does not result in a > segfault. > Same goes with a local build of musl, using -Os. Thanks Isaac, appreciated. Apparently the breakage is not as simple as it looked in my test here. > HTH, It does. > Isaac Rune
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.