[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150920183331.GN17773@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 14:33:31 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: pthread_join stuck in infinite loop
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 08:07:28PM +0200, Julien Ramseier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> pthread_join() never returns when calling it on a detached thread.
> I would expect it to return EINVAL instead.
Calling pthread_join on a detached thread or thread id which is no
longer valid results in undefined behavior. You can't do it. See:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/pthread_join.html
"The behavior is undefined if the value specified by the thread
argument to pthread_join() does not refer to a joinable thread."
and:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/V2_chap02.html#tag_15_09_02
"The lifetime of a thread ID ends after the thread terminates if it
was created with the detachstate attribute set to
PTHREAD_CREATE_DETACHED or if pthread_detach() or pthread_join() has
been called for that thread. A conforming implementation is free to
reuse a thread ID after its lifetime has ended. If an application
attempts to use a thread ID whose lifetime has ended, the behavior
is undefined.
If a thread is detached, its thread ID is invalid for use as an
argument in a call to pthread_detach() or pthread_join()."
Note that it's fundamentally impossible for it to be well-defined for
thread ids whose lifetimes have ended, and it wouldn't really make
sense to have it be defined for still-live detached threads since,
unless you perform additional synchronization to ensure this doesn't
happen, it's possible that a detached thread's exit could race with
your call to pthread_join and cause the id to become invalid.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
