Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK4o1WwDjBxFP3RqBB==JvHv6DaN0GXpyQ3Gpt1vMcenCXVfQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:16:37 +0100
From: Justin Cormack <justin@...cialbusservice.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Adjustments to roadmap

On 28 August 2015 at 05:21, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > 1. Unifying static/shared libc .o files.
>> >
>> > Right now, all the files in musl are built twice, once as .o for
>> > inclusion in libc.a, and once as ".lo" (my naming convention) for
>>
>> ..lo is conflicting with libtool generated objects btw.
>
> Yes. Since we're not using libtool that doesn't matter but it may be
> confusing to some people who see it.

NetBSD uses .pico for this.

Justin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.