[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559579C0.2020107@skarnet.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 19:49:52 +0200
From: Laurent Bercot <ska-dietlibc@...rnet.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Error relocating libc.so: (...): symbol not found
On 02/07/2015 18:54, Rich Felker wrote:
> It sounds like a broken libc.so. There should not be dynamic symbol
> references or definitions for libgcc symbols in libc.so. Is it
> possible that your toolchain is doing something wacky that links
> shared libgcc even when we try to do static libgcc?
It's very likely, since I'm manually tinkering with musl-gcc.specs
to make it work with the Aboriginal Linux toolchain (which normally
uses a gcc wrapper to enforce the use of uClibc). I didn't think
about it because my setup works flawlessly for application
compilation.
I suspect my defeat-the-wrappers shenanigans do not play nicely
with compiling musl itself. I'll investigate in that direction.
Thanks,
--
Laurent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
