[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOS_Y6RBoK3m331Cq28Uvy1z0ptoJVE2_GMXx_cvhHGcvrd==A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:53:44 +0900
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] configure: work around compilers that merely
warn for unknown options
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Shiz <hi@...z.me> wrote:
> some compilers (such as clang) accept unknown options without error,
> but then print warnings on each invocation, cluttering the build
> output and burying meaningful warnings.
You saw this already, right?
https://github.com/landley/toybox/commit/a913d92bad65
Specifically the bit about gcc 4.6 warning about the unknown
-Wno-be-stupid _only_ if it was already producing another warning...
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
