[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150519114326.GF11258@port70.net>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:43:26 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build process uses script to add CFI directives
to x86 asm
* u-wsnj@...ey.se <u-wsnj@...ey.se> [2015-05-19 13:16:22 +0200]:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:31:14AM +0200, Alex Dowad wrote:
> > awk code with not a word of complaint. The only trouble was with the use of "echo"
> > in the configure script -- BusyBox ash's "echo" is different from bash's.
>
> Indeed, portable sh scripts should be using printf instead of echo,
> every time.
>
> echo(){ printf '%s\n' "$@"; }
>
> yields a well-behaving "plain" echo variant.
>
configure already uses its own echo definition
so ash's echo should not be used
how did the config script end up calling ash's echo?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
