[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150519045252.GF17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 00:52:52 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inline llsc atomics when compiling for sh4a
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:56:18PM -0500, Bobby Bingham wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:34:02PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 01:55:16PM -0500, Bobby Bingham wrote:
> > > If we're building for sh4a, the compiler is already free to use
> > > instructions only available on sh4a, so we can do the same and inline the
> > > llsc atomics. If we're building for an older processor, we still do the
> > > same runtime atomics selection as before.
> >
> > Thanks! I think it's ok for commit as-is, but based on re-reading this
> > code I have some ideas for improving it that are orthogonal to this
> > change. See comments inline:
>
> Would you prefer I resend this patch to remove the LLSC_* macros at the
> same time, or another patch to remove them separately?
I've committed the original patch.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
