[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150517195622.GA4761@euler>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 21:56:23 +0200
From: Felix Janda <felix.janda@...teo.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: ppc soft-float regression
Felix Janda wrote:
> Felix Janda wrote:
> > Rich Felker wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:02:19PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > segfaults. git bisect says
> > > >
> > > > # first bad commit: [f3ddd173806fd5c60b3f034528ca24542aecc5b9] dynamic linker bootstrap overhaul
> > >
> > > Did you observe a regression here yourself, or just with Waldemar's
> > > binaries which you said were broken? If you think this commit really
> > > caused regressions on ppc I'll look into it but I don't want to waste
> > > time doing that if it's not broken.
> >
> > The commit is just the point where Waldemar's binary stopped working.
> > So not really a bug in musl.
>
> Actually, in my test ppc chroot bash (and more generally programs linked
> against ncurses) starts segfaulting (with a null-pointer access) after
> upgrading to musl-1.1.9.
The program
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <errno.h>
int main(void) {
return program_invocation_short_name[0];
}
starts segfaulting with the above commit.
Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
