[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE2XoE_q8Y7Ef2BAD3+d+g8bMzWtH3zXm4mpQ1-+USfOP7yiKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 16:03:20 +0800
From: 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: There is no tests for musl,
Understood, Indeed, I wanna to port musl to win32, doesn't know if
that's was a good idea.
2015-05-08 16:01 GMT+08:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>:
> * ?????????(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang@...il.com> [2015-05-08 15:38:33 +0800]:
>> That's really not so good for the stable.
>>
>
> it is a good thing
>
> a libc should provide portable semantics so implementation
> independent tests should be used not "tests for musl"
>
> http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Libc-Test
--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
